Rocket Lab Challenges NASA’s $700 Million Mars Communications Contract
Rocket Lab has appealed NASA’s decision to award its Mars Communications Network contract to Blue Origin, putting the agency’s plan to launch the mission in 2028 at risk of delay.
In theory, developing a spacecraft to travel to Mars, enter orbit around the Red Planet, and relay communications between Mars and large satellite dishes on Earth is a relatively straightforward proposition.
But NASA’s procurement of the Mars Communications Network spacecraft has become one of the agency’s highest-profile dramas of the year.
Rocket Lab appeals NASA’s Blue Origin decision
Earlier this month, NASA selected Blue Origin to develop, launch, and operate the approximately $700 million spacecraft. Rocket Lab, the primary competitor for the award, filed a protest with the U.S. Government Accountability Office on Friday.
Rocket Lab said NASA’s decision did not comply with eligibility requirements established by Congress.
“NASA’s award decision appears to be inconsistent with the eligibility criteria mandated by Congress,” the company said on X. “Furthermore, the agency’s disciplinary reviews of Rocket Lab’s technology volumes were inconsistent and made erroneous claims and conclusions.”
Blue Origin warns of possible delays to the 2028 mission
Blue Origin responded that the protest could delay the mission’s goal of launching in 2028.
“We remain confident in the strength of our proposal given NASA’s rigorous selection process and Congress’ clear intent to support a competitive Mars communications network program,” the company said.
“We look forward to moving forward with this urgent mission. Mars launch slots are limited and any delay poses significant risk to the timely deployment of this critical communications capability.”
Congressional eligibility rules are at the center of the dispute
Rocket Lab’s protest specifically references “congressionally mandated eligibility criteria,” which appears to be the central issue in the dispute over NASA’s Mars communications contract.
Source: arstechnica.com


